Proto-Semitic

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Proto-Semitic is the hypothetical proto-language of the Semitic languages. The earliest attestations of a Semitic language are in Akkadian, dating to ca. the 23rd century BC (see Sargon of Akkad). Early inscriptions in the (pre-)Proto-Canaanite alphabet, presumably by speakers of a Semitic language, date to ca. 1800 BC. Proto-Semitic would most probably have been spoken in the 4th millennium BC or earlier.

Contents

[edit] Homeland

The Semitic Urheimat is suggested by some to be in the Middle East; more specifically, Kienast (2001) advocates the Arabian peninsula. The East and West Semitic branches spread to Mesopotamia and the Levant during the Bronze Age, while South Semitic speakers migrated to Africa before the 8th century BC (see Dʿmt) via the Yemen gap.

Yet others believe that the first prehistoric speakers of the ancestral *Proto-Semitic language came from Africa. In historic times, the Semitic languages spread throughout the region via migrations from Arabia that displaced and subjugated the local populations. This alternative scenario makes Ethiopia the Proto-Semitic homeland[1].

Since Semitic is a branch of Afro-Asiatic, the question of the Proto-Afro-Asiatic homeland is a related debate.

More recently Juris Zarins has suggested that the development of a Circum-Arabian Nomadic Pastoral Complex of cultures developed in the period of the 6,200 BCE climatic crisis, stretching from Southern Palestine down the Red Sea shoreline, and northeastward into Syria and Iraq, spread Proto-Semitic languages through the region[2]. This complex may have developed from the fusion of Harifian and Pre-Pottery Neolithic B cultures in Southern Palestine. As Harifian used the Outacha retouch point technique found earlier in the Fayyum, it has been suggested that Proto-Semitic may have come from Egypt across the Sinai. Given the fact that Semitic is most closely related to the Ancient Egyptian language of all the Afro-Asiatic languages, this origin is also distinctly possible.

[edit] Sound system

Proto-Semitic is generally reconstructed as having the following phonemes (as usually transcribed in Semitology; tentative IPA values are given in square brackets)[3]:

Consonant phonemes
  Labial Inter-
dental
Dental/
Alveolar
Post-
alveolar
Palatal Velar Pharyn-
geal
Glottal
Nasal *m [m]   *n [n]          
Plosive voiceless *p [p]   *t [t]     *k [k]   *’ [ʔ]
voiced *b [b]   *d [d]     *g [g]    
emphatic *ṭ [tʼ]     *q [kʼ]  
Fricative voiceless   *ṯ [θ] *s [s] [ʃ]   *ḫ [x] *ḥ [ħ] *h [h]
voiced   *ḏ [ð] *z [z]     [ɣ] [ʕ]  
emphatic *ṱ [θʼ] *ṣ [sʼ]          
Lateral voiceless     [ɬ]          
voiced     *l [l]          
emphatic     *ṣ́ [ɬʼ]          
Trill     *r [r]          
Approximant         *y [j] *w [w]    

Notes:

  1. Nowadays it has become more fashionable to reconstruct *z, *s, *ṣ, and sometimes *ṣ́ as affricates, i.e. [dz], [ts], [tsʼ], and [tɬʼ]. If these sounds were affricates, many scholars are inclined to think that š was really a simple [s]. This is the reconstruction for other branches of Proto-Afro-Asiatic; suggesting that this was still the case for Proto-Semitic as well would explain merging in Canaanite with š, rather than s. However, the exact history of these sounds has yet to be worked out.
  2. The sounds notated here as "emphatic" sounds occur in nearly all Semitic languages, as well as in most other Afroasiatic languages, are generally reconstructed as glottalized in Proto-Semitic. In modern Semitic languages, they are variously realized as pharyngealized (Arabic, Aramaic) or glottalized (Ethiopian Semitic languages, Modern South Arabian languages); Modern Hebrew and Maltese are exceptions to this general retention, with all emphatics merging into plain consonants.
  3. In Aramaic and Hebrew, all non-emphatic stops were softened to fricatives when occurring singly after a vowel, leading to an alternation that was often later phonemicized as a result of the loss of gemination.

[edit] Reflexes of Proto-Semitic sounds in daughter languages

Each Proto-Semitic phoneme was reconstructed to explain a certain regular sound correspondence between various Semitic languages:

Proto-Semitic Akkadian Arabic Phoenician Hebrew Modern Hebrew Aramaic Ge'ez Modern South Arabian
*b b ب b b ב /b /v/, /b/ ב /b b /b/
*p p ف f p פ /p /f/, /p/ פ /p f /f/
*ḏ [ð] z ذ [ð] z ז z /z/ ד /d z /ð/
*ṯ [θ] š ث [θ] š שׁ š /ʃ/ ת /t s /θ/
*ṱ [θʼ] ظ [ðˁ] ṣ צ /ts/ ט /θˁ/
*d d د d d ד /d /d/ ד /d d /d/
*t t ت t t ת /t /t/ ת /t t /t/
*ṭ [tˁ] ط [tˁ] ט /t/ ט /tˁ/
[ʃ] š س s š שׁ š /ʃ/ שׁ š s /ʃ/, /h/
*z z ز z z ז z /z/ ז z z /z/
*s s س s s ס s /s/ ס s s /s/
*ṣ [sˁ] ص [sˁ] צ /ts/ צ /sˁ/
*l l ل l l ל l /l/ ל l l /l/
[ɬ] š ش š [ʃ] š שׂ s /s/ שׂ s ś /ɬ/
*ṣ́ [ɬˁ] ض [ɮˁ]→[dˁ] צ /ts/ ע ʻ ṣ́ /ɬˁ/
*g [ɡ] g ج ǧ [ɡʲ]→[ʤ] g ג /g /ɡ/ ג /g g /ɡ/
*k k ك k k כ /k /χ/, /k/ כ /k k /k/
*ḳ [kˁ] q ق q q q ק q /k/ ק q /q/
[ɣ] - غ ġ [ɣ] ʻ ע ʻ /ʔ/, - ע ʻ ʻ /ɣ/
*ḫ [x] خ [x] ח /χ/ ח /x/
[ʕ] - ع ʻ [ʕ] ʻ ע ʻ /ʔ/, - ע ʻ ʻ /ʕ/
*ḥ [ħ] - ح [ħ] ḥ ח /χ/ ח /ħ/
[ʔ] - ء ʼ [ʔ] ʼ א ʼ /ʔ/, - א ʼ ʼ /ʔ/
*h - ه h h ה h /h/, - ה h h /h/
*m m م m m מ m /m/ מ m m /m/
*n n ن n n נ n /n/ נ
ר
n
r
n /n/
*r r ر r r ר r /ʁ/ ר r r /r/
*w w و w
w
y
ו
י
w
y
/v/
/j/
ו
י
w
y
w /w/
*y [j] y ي y [j] y י y /j/ י y y /j/
Proto-Semitic Akkadian Arabic Phoenician Hebrew Modern Hebrew Aramaic Ge'ez Modern South Arabian

Notes:

  1. Arabic pronunciation is that of reconstructed Qur'anic Arabic of the 7th and 8th centuries CE. If the pronunciation of Modern Standard Arabic differs, this is indicated (for example, [ɡʲ]→[ʤ]).
  2. Proto-Semitic appears to have merged with *s in Tiberian Hebrew, but is still distinguished graphically.
  3. Biblical Hebrew as of the 3rd century BCE apparently still distinguished ġ and (based on transcriptions in the Septuagint).
  4. Although early Aramaic (pre-7th century BCE) had only 22 consonants in its alphabet, it apparently distinguished at least 27 of the original 29 Proto-Semitic phonemes, including *ḏ, *ṯ, *ṱ, , *ṣ́. This conclusion is based on the shifting representation of words etymologically containing these sounds; in early Aramaic writing, they are merged with z, š, , š, q, respectively, but later with d, t, , s, ʻ.[4]

[edit] Grammar

[edit] Independent Personal Pronouns

English PS Akkadian Arabic Ge'ez Hebrew Aramaic
I *ʔanāku, *ʔaniya anāku ʔanā, ʔāniy ʔana ʔānoxiy, ʔāniy ʔanā
Thou (masc.) *ʔanka > *ʔanta atta ʔanta ʔánta ʔattāh ʔantā
Thou (fem.) *ʔanti atti ʔanti ʔánti ʔatt ʔanti
He *suwa huwa wəʔətu huwʔ huwʔ
She *siya hiya yəʔəti hiyʔ hiyʔ
We *niyaħnū, *niyaħnā nīnu naħnu, niħnā nəħnā ʔanaħnuw náħnā
You two *ʔantunā ʔantumā
They two *sunā humā
You (masc.) *ʔantunū attunu ʔantumu ʔantəmu ʔattem ʔantun
You (fem.) *ʔantinā attina ʔantunna ʔantən ʔatten ʔanten
They (masc.) *sunū sunu humu ʔəmuntu hēm hinnun
They (fem.) *sinā sina hunna ʔəmāntu hēn hinnin

[edit] Cardinal numerals

English Proto-Semitic
One *ħad-, *ʕist-
Two *θn-, *kilʔ-
Three *θalāθ-
Four *rabaʕ-
Five *xams-
Six *sidθ-
Seven *sabʕ-
Eight *θamān-
Nine *tisʕ-
Ten *ʕaɬr-

[edit] References

  1. ^ e.g. A. Murtonen; see Fleming, Harold C. (1968), "Ethiopic Language History: Testing Linguistic Hypotheses in an Archaeological and Documentary Context" in Ethnohistory, Vol. 15, No. 4 (Autumn), pp. 353-388
  2. ^ Zarins, Juris (1990), "Early Pastoral Nomadism and the Settlement of Lower Mesopotamia" (Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research), No. 280 (Nov., 1990), pp. 31-65
  3. ^ Sáenz-Badillos, Angel [1988] (1993). "Hebrew in the context of the Semitic Languages", A History of the Hebrew Language (Historia de la Lengua Hebrea), trans. John Elwolde, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 18-19. ISBN 0-521-55634-1. 
  4. ^ "[http://www.arts.uwa.edu.au/LingWWW/LIN325/Notes/Phonology.pdf LIN325 Introduction to Semitic Languages Chapter 3: Phonology]". Retrieved on 2006-06-25.

[edit] See also

[edit] External links

This is an extract from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
offerte voli | hoteles | precios | voli | die verzeichnis | annuarie web | stop smoking london